An Interview with Kyle A. Thomas

Kyle A. Thomas is a theatre artist and doctoral student studying theatre history at the University of Illinois.  Originally from Little Rock, Arkansas, Kyle has traveled all over the world teaching, performing, and learning about these performative creatures called Human Beings.  You can find out more at his website: www.kyleathomas.net. Many thanks to Eddie Carson for being a great teacher and for asking all of the hard questions.

1. Tell us about your experience being educated in a Christian high school and college. What were the pros and cons?

First of all, let me quickly summarize the educational experiences over the course of my life so that there is a contextual baseline from which these comments can be understood.  I attended Christian private schools at the elementary and high school levels, but attended a public school for middle school.  After high school I attended a Christian private four-year liberal arts university.  Some years later I also taught for a Christian private school for three years before entering graduate school at a public university.  In addition to my graduate work I also teach for this university and at the local public community college.

So having quickly outlined that information, I will begin with the thing that I enjoyed most about my experience as a student in Christian private schools.  The two schools I attended were relatively small compared to other schools in the area.  This is perhaps due to the cost of private school education, not necessarily their Christian emphasis.  Nonetheless, I was a much better student when I received more personal attention from my teachers.  This is perhaps the most important overall aspect I received from my experiences in these two schools.

But, I would also add that the emphasis on a Christian education did have a lot of positive effects on my life.  For example, I remember a Bible class I was required to take in high school where we were taught to use philosophical, logical, scientific, and other forms of argumentation to prove the existence of a Creator and eventually the validity of the Bible and superiority of the Christian faith over other faiths.  Essentially, this was a class designed to teach us how to talk to an atheist about the Christian God.  I learned so much about argumentative and rhetorical techniques in this class, most of which continue to serve me well in my current academic work.

This course opened the door to questions that I had never asked myself.  I wanted to understand the perspective of other faiths and non-believers.  I was also set upon a course of exploration about WHY I personally chose to believe in the Christian faith.  Surely if I had been born in Saudi Arabia I would be asking myself the same question about Islam, so I needed to know why my faith needed to be MY faith.  Eventually though, over the course of a decade or more, these questions and exploration led me to sources that intellectually shook loose my faith in a higher spiritual power that is sentient and the source of all that is.  I will always be glad that I took that class.

In addition to that class, my Christian education also had a particular historical narrative that was a part of its spiritual pedagogy.  The Bible is a historical book and this aspect of its ontology was highly fascinating to me.  How did it come into being?  Who wrote it?  Why?  How did it survive the centuries?  Etc.  This singular focus on one historical text across many different academic fields was actually a helpful way of approaching history.  Instead of examining a large historical epoch, I was enrolled in classes that were concerned with the historical context surrounding this book.  Whether it was an actual history course, literature based, or theologically oriented, there were always particular methodologies employed in exploring the historical qualities and stories of the Bible.  Of course, I found this constant historical education very enjoyable and much of my early work in the study of history dealt with Christian religious history.  Even still, it is a major part of my research.

As to the more negative experiences with Christian education I must admit that, looking back, it is hard to identify moments where I didn’t feel that I was being indoctrinated within reclusive walls.  Even in my youth I was very aware of the fact that there were certain things that my peers in secular schools were taught that I was not.  For example, I found that my knowledge about evolution was severely underdeveloped as I went to college because a lack of emphasis on it during my science classes in school.  The excuses used to justify a modified Christian perspective towards subjects like evolution were, even at the time, questionable and often defensive.  Teachers and students alike knew the subject areas that were contentious and in most cases my teachers avoided any debate on the topic (which, in my experience, was rarely expressed from students).

My best classes were the ones where we were encouraged to spur debate and received a respectful and receptive environment to voice our opinions (and there were classes like this).  But there were classes where this was highly discouraged.  I do remember clearly a few classes where the only way to do well was to repeat exactly what the teacher wanted you to repeat exactly the way it was delivered to you.  In instances of differing opinion I might experience public shaming or ridicule.  I was put into the dilemma of having to question whether I should provide an [subjective] answer I disagreed with on an assignment and possibly poorly in the class or just capitulate and do what the teacher wished in order to do well in the class.  That was not education, it was brainwashing.

2. What was it like having Eddie Carson as a teacher during his first year? Be honest. What are your thoughts regarding the rest of your teachers in shaping your intellect?


Eddie Carson was one of my favorite teachers.  I believe this is because he unlocked a natural enjoyment of history that I was unaware of until that point, mostly due to poor history classes and teachers that I had had in earlier years.  The class he taught for me, World History, is impossibly difficult to cover from a pedagogical standpoint.  But, it was his approach to history that unlocked my interest in the subject.  He would ask us to think about historical events and civilizations in more abstract ways – this was not just about dates and names.  For example, I remember an assignment where we were instructed to create our own form of government.  There were no limitations, just write a one-page paper about a form of governance you would create.  Feeling the rush of having so much power, it was hard not to want to centralize authority around myself; I actually had to curtail my own ambition for the good of those that I governed.  I had to consider more than just myself, which for an eighteen-year-old boy is difficult to do (note: Mr. Carson actually had to move me to a different desk in the room midway through the year because I wouldn’t stop turning around to flirt with the girl that sat behind me).

Although there were times I did find the class boring (it was still early in the use of PowerPoint as a teaching tool and Mr. Carson’s slides could be awfully heavy with text), I knew that he wanted to bring history to us, make it more alive.  To this end he brought in his regalia from when he received his Master’s Degree.  He used this to explain the educational foundations we still use that were built in the Middle Ages.  I was mesmerized!  For one, I was fascinated by European history, especially as a child of German and English immigrant families, but knew almost nothing about it.  And here it was living in front of me.  That was a decisive moment in my life – I was going to receive that regalia in my future.  We learned about the Germanic tribes of central Europe, something I knew so very little about, and from that time I have been curious about that particular cultural history and have sought to fill its holes.

Like Mr. Carson, most of the influential teachers in my life encouraged my interests within the parameters of their classes.  They did not limit me to a narrow understanding of things and often pushed me beyond what I thought I was capable of.

3. Tell us about OBU. Did you have a mentor? What did you enjoy most about OBU and the faculty? What work or writing has driven your intellect?


Yes, I had a very strong mentor at OBU.  He was the chair of the Department of Theatre and is now the Dean of the School of Fine Arts.  For the sake of privacy I’ll refer to him as Dr. H.  Truthfully, I could write a novel about the impact he has had on my life, but I’ll try to keep things brief.  Not only did he see a talent in me that I had only begun to understand as a freshman in college, but also he would not let me rest until I had realized what I could do with that talent.  He pushed me like no other teacher before and none since.  He went beyond teaching me the craft of acting or the basics of directing and taught me about the ART – giving me a way to interact with a big world full of diverse people.  I was never allowed to just skirt by on the basics but was always asked about which plays I was reading, what monologues or scenes I was working on, what auditions I would be attending, etc.  Essentially, he opened up the world to me and helped me realize that this life is what I make of it.  He taught me that success does not come to the talented but to the hard working.  After all, I was not the most talented actor or director, but I was taught the value and transformative power of education.  By the time I finished undergrad I was ready to take on any challenge knowing that if I set my mind and my energy to something that I could achieve it.

In addition to his mentorship, Dr. H. also introduced me to a playwright/theorist that would change my life.  I took Theatre History my junior year and while studying the important figures of the twentieth century I was introduced to the work of Bertolt Brecht.  Brecht was a German communist working and writing in Berlin in the years before the Nazi takeover of power.  He was greatly influenced by cabaret, clowning, puppetry, and the work of the German expressionists.  He attempted to create a theatre that was anti-realist and in opposition to what he saw as dangerously bourgeois.  Dr. H. encouraged my study of Brecht even going to so far as to advocate for my senior arts paper to emphasize Brecht’s theory of the Epic Theatre.

Brecht’s work influenced my own directing methods and when I while I was teaching theatre at the high school and middle school level I worked with my best students on applying some of his theories into our own devised work.  Now I apply one of his core theories, the Verfremdungseffekt, in my work researching acting and directing methods for approaching performance of historical texts.

I must also mention another professor that was very influential in my life even though I wasn’t as close to her as I was to Dr. H.  I’ll call her Dr. T.  Dr. T. was my German professor and all of us in her class suspected she was an atheist.  She was a brilliant woman and fluent in several different languages.  For this reason she was always mentioning her work with translating Kant, Nietzsche, Marx, Tolstoy, Trotsky, and others.  She never said much about them, but she would often drop a little piece of information into the pool of students to see if anyone would bite.  I bit.  She played her cards close to the chest and never revealed much about her thoughts or her work, deferring to recommended office visit after class.  I remember asking her about her beliefs and she would always answer with questions.  I wondered why a woman who was an atheist would teach at a Christian university.  But her intellect was enthralling and I was challenged by her queries.  Among the many things she asked me about I remember one very clear declarative statement she once told me: “Kyle, you will be a very smart person and you will be an atheist.”  I was so upset by this.  How could she think this about me!  I had told her about my faith and how passionate I was about my God and my Jesus.  Today, I wonder what it was that she saw in me that caused her to say this.  There are many curious Christians that have their faith strengthened.  What was different about me?

If I have to summarize my experience with OBU I would put it this way: it was a wonderful institution that allowed me to ask big questions, explore all that I was ready to experience, peaked my curiosity, and left me wanting more out of life.  It is that last point that I think this is the mark of a great school, but OBU already had the answer for that: Jesus.  Despite all the intellectual doors the school opened for me, the answer still always needed to be Jesus (even if this wasn’t always explicitly stated).  It’s ok to read Nietzsche as long as you accept that he’s wrong about a lot of things.  I didn’t know it at the time but my thirst for life wasn’t being satiated with the answer of Jesus.

4. I recall you being very passionate about theater while at CAC. The fact that both you and your brother have committed to this profession is intriguing. What drove you to be an academic with a passion for fine arts?

The easy answer to this is that I love history as much as theatre.  After leaving undergrad I had very little formal history education but read anything I could get my hands on, especially if it dealt with the Middle Ages or church history.  Some of those books include: God’s Crucible: Islam and the Making of Europe, 570-1215 by David Levering Lewis; Life in a Medieval Village by Frances and Joseph Gies; A Mighty Fortress: A New History of the German People by Steven Ozment; The Lost History of Christianity by Philip Jenkins; Lies My Teacher Told Me by James W. Loewen.  I spent several years acting and directing but these were things were not enough to keep me satisfied on a daily basis.  I also loved teaching but wanted to find a way to combine all three: theatre, history, and teaching.  Grad school was the natural choice.  The University of Illinois has one of the oldest Theatre History PhDs in the country and I also get to work with one of the most respected medieval theatre historians in the United States.  My driving motivation right now is to open up history to people through the use of theatre.  I always say that theatre is the laboratory of life.  Humans are performative creatures and in order to study humanity we must understand this aspect of our existence.  Much like mathematics is the language of the universe (you could even say the language of God) I believe that the arts are the language of humanity – they are our cultural markers and the entry point for understanding our condition at any given throughout our history.

5. What role has the theater played in your religious evolution? Being an atheist, how did you come to this realization?

The biggest thing theatre has done for me during the religious journey of my life is constantly push me to respectfully and honestly approach the perspectives of others – to try and understand the world through their eyes.  As an actor I must see the world through my character’s eyes without the bias of my own perspective.  This is extremely challenging and has tested my patience over the years.  I have played a wide range of characters, many of which never espouse a particular religious standpoint.  But, because I was a conservative kid from the south it didn’t take much to push my boundaries.  I have played gay characters, abused characters, loved characters, hated characters, lost characters, sexualized characters, terrified characters, funny characters, and for each one I had to step into their world, into their state of being.  This training helped me see MY world differently as well.  In the four years I was in undergrad I think my world grew tremendously as I learned to listen to others and really try to understand their perspective.  And I wanted to know more about the world writ large.  I traveled, studied different languages, and sought new experiences to stretch myself.  Once I had a taste of more than the American south, I was hooked and had to have more.

Eventually, this led to bigger questions about religion and belief.  To go back to my description of my religion class in high school, I wanted to know my faith was MY faith.  As my respect for the various ways of seeing and experiencing the world had grown through my undergrad years I realized that my religion seemed more and more exclusive and this significantly bothered me.  I was turned on the writings of John Shelby Spong, an Episcopalian bishop who had many similar experiences with religion in his life.  [His books are wonderful and I highly recommend them, especially Jesus for the Non-religious.  I’ve also had the pleasure of meeting him and attending some of his lectures and he is the best listener and most patient man I have ever met.]  Slowly, I began to pull away from religion as an institutionalized idea of faith and tried to simply define my faith for myself.  But as someone trained to explore the viewpoints of all people I also turned to atheist writers to see how I felt about their point of view.  The first two writers I picked up, Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins, put me off and I found them offensive.  I found them to be angry atheists.  Why were they so angry?  Why did they so vehemently attack religion?  I couldn’t shake these questions and I went looking for writers who had left Christianity and embraced atheism.  Dan Barker and John W. Loftus, both former Christian preachers, posed some of the most gut-wrenching questions and their experiences with Christianity, similar to my own, left me raw and upset.  Philosophers like Daniel C. Dennett, along with Hitchens and Dawkins also used a lot of scientific knowledge in their books, which led me to Neil Degrasse Tyson and Michio Kaku, in order to posit scientific, yet fascinatingly beautiful, answers for being and consciousness.  By my late twenties, having already abandoned religion, I no longer sought faith in the form of spirituality.  I do have faith though.  Faith that people can do good in this world.  Faith in my abilities and myself.  Faith in hearts and minds of others.  Faith in the love of my friends and family.*

*I should mention that my partner of eight years and I took much of this journey together.  We were both raised in evangelical homes.  It was she who suggested I check out Dennett, Spong, and Barker.  And while we are no longer together, I will always cherish this journey we took together and thank her for being a loving, understanding, and equally challenging force for good in my life.

Advertisements

17 thoughts on “An Interview with Kyle A. Thomas

  1. This is a very good post. I cannot help, as a Christian, wonder if Kyle’s religious view is shaped by the secular culture of the theater world. I have always assumed that there is a lack of balance in that the theater world does not promote religious views in a positive way. That said, I do appreciate Kyle being open and having a respect for other peoples beliefs. That is nice to know.

  2. I am curious to hear how Kyles family feels about the direction he has moved in. Kyle, you did state that you were very conservative. I just looked up CAC and OBU. Those are pretty conservative schools. It must have been very difficult for you.

  3. Kyle: You noted God’s Crucible: Islam and the Making of Europe, 570-1215 by David Levering Lewis. Interesting thing about Lewis is that his academic background is in European History; however, he is most known for being an Americanist Scholar, particularly for the fact that he is thought to be the greatest W.E.B. Du Bois scholar around.

    I like to write a great deal about Jesus. I recently submitted an essay on race, faith, and Jesus to be published. That said, would you find it difficult to return to a OBU or a CAC to teach, perform, and write, though you have some teaching experience in such a setting already? Also, you addressed getting in the role of various characters, might you rethink your relationship with Jesus if forced to study and take on a role of a man sent to save humanity?

  4. I too find the late Hitchens and Dawkins to be bitter people. I read Hitchen’s work God is not Great. He articulated no original thought in it accept well, if there is a God, who does this God allow bad things to happen to good people. He continues to say that Christians are great persecutors of humanity, just look at the crusades. That book was not great. I am curious about Kyle’s take on Karl Barth. He noted the usual great thinkers in Marx, Kant, etc, but no Barth.

  5. Thanks for the great questions and the opportunity to do this!

    Jen – Yes, the theatre is very secular, but if there is one place that themes from the Bible are brought to life it has to be theatre (and film). Themes like sacrifice, love, forgiveness, and the hope that humanity will see past more than just individual ambitions are all brought to life in the stories we tell. For a long time I thought, “This is the way to reach a secular audience who does not know Christ, through secular stories that point to Him.” It was my way of going out into the world to spread that message because I didn’t believe that non-Christian audiences would attend Christian theatre. In my experience, most people who do attend Christian theatre are already Christian. I could probably write a book about being a Christian in the theatre and reconciling my beliefs with my art.

    Andy – It was very difficult to leave my beliefs behind. For so long these were the core aspect of how I defined myself and my life. I couldn’t go into all the details because then you’d be reading a novel, but this was a long process. I often laugh when I think about where I was just 15 years ago: a very conservative fundamentalist evangelical Christian kid from the South who attended Christian private schools. I’m so very different from that person I was then.

    Eddie – Yes, I did know that about Lewis but at the time I didn’t know a lot of European historians (he’s also a Little Rock native). I would actually welcome the opportunity to teach at a religious institution again. When I was teaching at a Christian private school I was right in the middle of my transition from religion based faith to a more individual approach. I once pulled out my Hitchens book ‘God is Not Great’ to see what would happen among my colleagues. I don’t know if anyone saw it, but there was no comment. I would teach at these schools as long as the administration knew and respected my particular standpoints. All I do is ask questions of my students. I do not want to rob them of their faith, but if my questions strengthen their faith then that’s great! But, I think there aren’t enough teachers asking the hard questions.

    I’ve never had to play a character asked to save the whole of humanity, but when I was a Christian I did give it much thought: “What was the earthly life of Jesus like?” But, I think we can all ask ourselves about what we would do if we had to die in order to save others. I can unequivocally answer that if I must die in order to save the lives of others I would do so. But, I think this is an easy question for someone raised in a privileged position in the world and in history. I don’t experience the horrors of living on a daily basis – persecution, famine, disease, war, etc. Are all people worth saving? That is a harder question. I believe that it’s easy to say “yes” when I have my American perspective. Jesus died to save all humanity from an eternity without God. Why did Jesus need to do this? This brings up a whole host of points that I would love to delve into, but perhaps that’s best for another blog post!

    • I wrote a post not too long ago about how we should rethink Christian education. Hence, why not have folks who think like you teaching students. Such a diverse forum of thinking, in my opinion, allows students to grow in their faith. Some will not. But at least they are allowed to be challenged in a safe arena.

      As for Lewis, I am ashamed to admit that I had no idea he was a native of Little Rock. I have now read 4 of his books and a number of papers.

      • I agree!! I would love to talk to young people about my journey and answer questions. Too many teachers don’t trust the minds and abilities of young students to digest difficult and abstract concepts. Thus, we end up with an education system that values the answer over the question.

  6. Lewis – I agree that Hitchens was a bitter writer and I was not impressed by his work. But I think Christians need to ask themselves “why?” What did he have to be so upset about? Dawkins is similar in his approach towards Islam.

    I mention Marx et al. because these were names my teacher tossed out to us while I was at OBU. I, like many young people that grew up similar to my upbringing, knew of these names but had never attempted to read, let alone digest, their writings.

    I am familiar with Barth and some of his theological perspectives, mostly through some secondary sources and conversation. I have not read any of his work, but I am reading Bonheoffer’s biography by Eric Metaxas (albeit slowly). I know about his impact on theology in the twentieth century, but because I’m not as well read on him as I should be, I really haven’t formed an opinion toward his work.

  7. You said you were working on your doctorates at University of Illinois. I’m curious what your dissertation is on.

    • I’m still working on my prospectus at the moment, I’ll be ABD in March (if all goes well). But, I’m planning to explore the development of theatrical and use of theatrical texts from the early Middle Ages to the High Middle Ages. I’m using the 12th-century ‘Ludus de Antichristo’ to show the pedagogical, rhetorical, and literary value these texts and their performances held through the centuries.

    • Yes, I’m in the middle of my Latin studies. I’m getting better, but I still have a ways to go. In addition to the PhD I’m getting a certification in Medieval Studies (it’s similar to a grad minor), and that requires that I have a proficiency in Latin. I’m also highly proficient in German (I consider it my second language). Much of my works centers on central Europe in the German lands so I do try to take classes in old germanic languages and have worked some with Old High German and Anglo-Saxon.

      I will need at least six months, maybe more. I’m working on a fellowship right now for next summer. I’ll probably do most of my work out of Bavaria and the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek.

  8. I know this is a bit late, but better late than never. I’d like to reply to the first comment which I find to be a gross generalization and targeting of the theatre profession. I’m curious if Jen, this was from a specific experience with theatre professionals or a production.
    Also, I really appreciate the openness of this conversation about Christian education. Particularly I responded to the addressing of indoctrination of stories over science, as if the administration has something to fear if students are taught evolution. The best teachers in the Christian institutions that I have had allowed me to explore all points of view, they really helped me adjust when I made a huge move to the east coast, surrounded by people of all sorts of backgrounds. Sheltering only leads to more sheltering and eliminates the capacity for critical, articulate thought in each student.
    Coming from two of the Christian institutions that Kyle mentions in this interview, I will say I had a unique experience as a female in these Biblical-heavy institutions (where rules and assumptions about my gender identity restricted behavior or thwarted expectations for my own potential).

    • Glad to see your thoughts Shelby! I often think how much easier I had compared to women in similar circumstances in breaking out of some of the more restrictive traditions of Christian education.

  9. Pingback: Recent Travels | The Professor

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s